Ever since the result of the independence referendum was known, the unionist mantra has been to demand that Yes voters, particularly the nasty SNP types, should respect the result.
“The Scottish people have spoken”, they say, “so you must respect the will of the Scottish people “.
However, it soon became clear that the Unionist argument would have been more accurately expressed as “you respect the result of the referendum because somebody should”. Because ever since the result was known, the Tory government and the unionist media have shown clearly that they have absolutely no intention of respecting the result, a result obtained by Scots making a judgement between two offers, one for independence and one for remaining in the Union. Unfortunately (for us), the Union offer turned out to be smoke and mirrors. In fact, it was so smoky and mirrored that it gave smoke and mirrors a bad name.
Only hours had passed when David Cameron, a signatory of the now world-famous Vow, had announced his intention to introduce EVEL, the well-named scheme to deprive Scots MPs of the opportunity to vote on bills which supposedly only apply to England, but, as it turns out, also includes bills with a knock-on effect on the Scottish block grant. This was followed by the infamous Smith Commission, which reduced the concept of “Home Rule” to the ability to design street signs and little else. Scottish Labour, presumably on the instructions of their bosses in London, were particularly keen on making sure the Scots got nothing.
Worse was to follow when the Scotland Bill, (very) loosely based on the outcome of Smith, came before Westminster. Tories, and often Labour too, few of whom could be bothered to attend the debates, would turn up at each division to vote against any sensible increase in the powers being offered to the Scottish Government.
In the meantime, in May 2015, we had an election to the UK parliament. Respect the result of the referendum, the Unionists said. It’s time to move on, they said. Scots voters, obviously so impressed by the concept of “respecting the referendum result”, turned out in numbers and elected 56 SNP MPs out of 59, leaving the Unionist parties, Labour, Tories and LibDems with a rump of 1 MP each. Funnily enough, no one in any unionist party suggested that we should respect the result of the General Election. The SNP haven’t got a mandate, they bleated, because they got less than 50% of the vote (true, it was a mere 49.97%). The fact that the Tories got elected in Westminster with only 37% of the vote seemed to have escaped their memory. For Unionists, the will of the Scottish people should only be respected when they get the right answer. Otherwise, they should be ignored … because they’re just … WRONG … obviously.
Now, to bring us right up to date, we had the Scottish Parliament elections just a few days ago. Respect the result of the referendum, the Unionists said. It’s time to move on, they said. However, once again, Scots voters chose to ignore the siren calls of the Unionists and voted for a third term for the SNP with an increased number of constituency votes and an increased share of the votes. For a variety of reasons, including the so-called tactical voting effect and the virtual collapse of the Labour vote, on this occasion the SNP did not get a majority in Parliament, despite their increased vote share. The collapse of the Labour vote allowed the Tories to overtake them for second place and the kudos of being the official opposition. This allowed the Tory media, including the BBC, to claim the election as a triumph for the Tories and a disaster for the SNP and allowed an overexcited Ruth Davidson to claim that she had a mandate to say no to a second referendum, despite the huge difference in the number of MSPs and share of the vote.. In all the excitement, many people didn’t even notice that the Tories had a lower vote share than Labour, 22% to Labour’s 22.6%.
Breaking news. The appointment of Ken Macintosh as Presiding Officer slightly reduces the gap between the SNP and the rest, but makes no material difference to the current parliamentary challenge for the SNP.
Breaking news 2. Very impressed by my (new) local MSP, Clare Haughey, who took the oath today with calmness and aplomb. A great start. She’ll do Rutherglen, and the Scottish Parliament, proud. Gon yersel, Clare.
So what have we learned about the attitude of the Unionist parties post referendum. We know now that the Unionist desire for all of us to “respect the will of the Scottish people” and move on only applies when the Scottish people give the right answer and, in any case, only applies to the Scottish people. So, it applies for the referendum result, but doesn’t apply when the Scottish people deliver an overwhelming mandate to the SNP, such as in the 2015 and 2016 elections. It only applies to Scots It doesn’t apply to anybody else. So when Unionists totally ignore the promises made about what would be delivered following a No vote, this is not disrespecting the will of the Scottish people, this is just … politics? Others might describe it more like taking the piss, but I wouldn’t use such phrases myself.
Do we think they’ll change? Does anyone think they’ll change? Of course they won’t. Only independence can take us away from the malign influence of the Westminster Tories, and it can’t come soon enough.