Some thoughts post-election

It was a depressing result. I had almost convinced myself that Forbes would win as it looked as if she had done a deal when she changed sides half way through. If a deal was done, it wasn’t to make her Deputy FM as we saw later with the appointment of Shona Robison, the GRRB queen. You can see Sturgeon’s and Harvie’s sticky fingers all over that. Forbes was apparently offered Rural Affairs (I thought rural affairs were Yousaf’s speciality) which would have been a big demotion from Finance, which she wisely refused. Interestingly, I thought there were rules about sacking or demoting someone on their return from maternity leave. Perhaps they don’t apply to politicians. The rest of his gender neutral cabinet will, I’m sure, be equally interesting.

Of course, Yousaf is not afraid to play the race card. Constantly referring to himself in the election as a minority, he implied that only he of the three candidates was able to have an opinion about trans issues. He also made a statement in Parliament complaining that white people occupied most senior positions in Scottish society, ignoring the fact that the Scottish population demographic is about 96% white.

What else can we take from the election? It looks like the majority of SNP members are not independence supporters. No one would vote for Yousaf if they were, though some might have voted early for Forbes before she changed sides. Ash got only 5.5k votes, much less than I expected though I didn’t really expect her to be better than third. I don’t believe that anyone who voted for Ash Reagan would have put Yousaf as second choice. The two are at opposite ends of the political spectrum. Combined with the nonsense of him saying in an interview that he was ahead on first preferences, this reinforces my view that the vote was fiddled.

Can we still consider the SNP as a party of independence? After eight and a half years of Sturgeon’s inaction and with Yousaf saying and showing every sign of being more of the same, it seems unlikely that the Scottish Government will initiate any moves or undertake any preparation for independence in the next three years. However, you can be sure they’ll make a lot of noise just before the Holyrood election.

I think SNP may lose a lot of seats in UK GE, but that will make no difference as SNP MPs achieve nothing in Westminster anyway. The real danger is 2026. SNP may lose a lot of constituency seats, especially if Alba stands, which I think they should, as the SNP are just one more devolutionist party, but it’s going to take a lot of hard work (and luck) for enough ex-SNP votes to go to Alba to get them elected in any constituencies, so we’ll have to depend on list seats to get an independence majority. And we need an independence majority because the unionists will take their chance to destroy Scotland if they’re in the majority.

It was interesting that Yousaf’s first actions were to beg for an S30 (almost instant rejection, but duty done) and to cosy up to his soul mates in the Greens. Gives a clear indication of what this administration is going to concentrate on.

I wonder if the police investigations into the missing money will continue. Will we ever find out what all the £600k was spent on? We have heard that about £200k went to keep Angus Robertson afloat until he could get a seat in HR. Is it true? It has been suggested that £100k+ went to pay Alyn Smith’s costs for his defamation of the guy in charge of the Brexit party. Is it true? And the rest? Who knows? Maybe on the alleged office refurbishment? Maybe just to keep Sturgeon and Murrell in the standard to which they had become accustomed? Whatever, we know it’s gone and after next year’s UK election, the reduction in seats will mean a corresponding reduction in Short money, so perhaps the SNP won’t have enough to keep them afloat. What then, I wonder?

This makes the election of Yousaf all the more surprising. The SNP must have expected the reaction they got and the likely fallout in terms of membership losses, so what advantage did the party get that was more valuable than the loss of money and position? I suppose we all have our own ideas. Has Yousaf agreed to keep the location of the buried bodies a secret, while perhaps the other two wouldn’t have? Who knows, but it must have been something really important to risk this level of rejection.

Where do we go from here? Is it time to write off the SNP as having any role in the independence movement or should we wait for a few months to see what happens? I think from the reaction to news of the election on Twitter, where umpteen people announced that they were resigning from the SNP and joining Alba, means many independence supporters have already made up their minds. So it looks as if we have but two alternatives. Either we decide that the independence movement can no longer rely on politicians and the people have to make it happen or we have to quickly build up a replacement to the SNP, likely Alba. Both seem fraught with difficulty, but we have one advantage. The UK GE can give us a pointer to which route is working better and we don’t really have to worry too much if we get the tactics wrong because, as I said earlier, the result doesn’t matter if more or fewer SNP MPs get elected as they’ll do no good in Westminster anyway.

So let’s decide what we’re going to do, go for it full steam ahead, and if it doesn’t work out next year, we’ve got two years to revise the strategy before the more important election in 2026.

LATE NEWS
Yousaf’s Cabinet announced. The team of all the talents – NOT. He managed (deliberately?) to insult the only two decent ministers (Forbes and McKee) from Sturgeon’s last cabinet by offering them reduced roles which they both turned down. Instead, we have a bunch of GRR pals, pretty much all of them unsuited to their roles, none more so than Shona Robison, who can only count past 10 if she takes her shoes off, Shirley-Anne Somerville, who would have been unsuited for any post, and Angela Constance, the only minister who can give Yousaf a run for failures, so bad that even Sturgeon got rid of her. None of the Cabinet will make Yousaf look bad, but he can do that all himself.


BEAT THE CENSORS
Many Facebook sites are increasingly censoring bloggers like myself who can be critical of the actions of the SNP and the Scottish Government. They are attempting to prevent bloggers from getting their message out, so we have to depend on readers sharing the blog posts. If you liked this post or others I have written, please share this and take out a free subscription by clicking the follow button on the home page or on the posts. You will then be notified by email of any new posts on the blog. Thank you.


SALVO
The progress of Salvo has been the most encouraging development since 2022. It is doing sterling work educating Scots about the Claim of Right and spelling out what it means that the Scottish people are sovereign, not any Parliament. Salvo has joined with Liberation.scot to develop campaigns the results of which will be available soon.

LIBERATION.SCOT
We are seeking to build up liberation.scot to at least 100,000 signatures as part of our plan to win recognition at the UN as an official liberation movement. We intend to internationalise our battle for independence and through the setting up of the Scottish National Council we will develop our arguments to win progress in the international courts. Please help by signing up at liberation.scot. The membership of liberation.scot is also where the first members of Scottish National Congress will be balloted for selection.


Please God, don’t let this farce continue

Mike Russell said yesterday that the most important thing was the continuation of the leadership election process to put a new leader in place as soon as possible.

So, he wants to continue the process set up to make sure Humza Yousaf gets elected and to make sure the rest of the shady goings-on are kept hidden. OK, a few nasties have come out, but there’s so much more that could appear so let’s not rock the boat any harder.

Let’s just think about the current process.

Nobody knows how many members the party has (Even Mike Russell claimed not to know how many had left). But we do know that Mi Voice claimed to have received 78,000 names to be emailed just before the party claimed to have 72,000 members. Some of these members won’t be reachable by email, so just how many email members are there?

We also know that Murray Foote resigned as head of SNP media as he had learned that the 72,000 figure he had been told was wrong. We can be pretty sure that means the figure was too high, not too low.

So just how many members does the SNP have? Surely the starting point of any election is to know just how many people are entitled to vote? If we have no idea who the ballot papers went to, how can we accept everyone’s vote as genuine?

How can the election continue under these circumstances?

We also know that one candidate received advance notice of Sturgeon’s retirement and had much more time to prepare than the other two, who had only a couple of days to put together a full leadership bid.

We also know that the election timescale was fixed to give one candidate an advantage, preventing the other two from getting their message out to voters.

We also know that a budget of £5,000 was fixed for each candidate, preventing two candidates from putting together a campaign team (they had no time anyway), but not stopping the favoured candidate from having dozens of SNP staffers and civil servants working for free because they were ‘on holiday’.

We also know that SNP HQ sent out dozens of messages supporting one candidate, but nothing for the other two. And they sent out 10-15 press releases a day supporting only one candidate.

We also know that an MSP was ‘accidentally’ allowed to send emails supporting one candidate to every party member in the South of Scotland, while the other two were refused the same facility.

Can anyone really say that the leadership election has been conducted fairly and there are any circumstances where it will produce a fair and untarnished result?

How can the election continue under these circumstances? It must be stopped and rerun when all the issues have been resolved. New election, new rules.

However, it’s impossible to forget the advantage one candidate has already received. Even in a rerun, voters will still remember all the extra publicity about one candidate, so I think Humza Yousaf needs to consider his position as a candidate.

Where Vileness Lies

Just a quick post prompted by recent events which made me really angry.

Yesterday, I innocently sent an email to my local Yes group offering to forward copies of postings from a guy who calls himself ‘smitty’, who claims to be a mole in the Humza camp.  I thought it might be of interest to the members.  However, it appears I made a mistake by saying that the postings were BTL comments on the Wings website.

From some replies I got, it seems that not only is Wings vile, but anyone who posts a comment on the Wings’ website is equally vile and those who replied had no interest in seeing smitty’s postings.  I have to confess now that I have myself posted comments on the Wings website, so I suppose I must be one of the vile people. I’ll wear this vileness with pride.

I have my own views on vileness and where vileness lies.

In my opinion, true vileness in the Yes movement can only be found in the SNP leadership who have, for the last eight and a half years, used independence as a marketing tool with absolutely no interest or intention of actually delivering it.  During that period, nothing has been done to bring independence closer, no campaigning, no preparation, nothing.

In fact, there is an argument that the SNP leadership have actually sought to prevent independence while pretending to support it. Surely, no party supporting Scotland and Scottish independence would ever have ignored so many opportunities, would ever have concentrated solely on controversial and divisive policies, would ever have sold our offshore wind future to multi-nationals for buttons, would ever have ignored the opportunity to improve the island ferry services, would ever have appointed known unionists in senior party and government positions and all the rest.

Nicola Sturgeon, Peter Murrell, John Swinney and virtually 100% of the elected members of the SNP are only in it for the money.  They have no interest in delivering independence because it might mean loss of an income that most would have no chance of replicating in the real world.  These people have probably destroyed the chance of independence in my lifetime.  No other leaders of the SNP have ever had that accolade. 

Using the same criteria as with Wings commenters, everyone who still supports the SNP must also be tainted with vileness.  After all this time, how can anyone support the leadership’s vileness without some of it rubbing off.  (As an aside, any SNP member who votes for Yousaf in the current leadership election is only voting for a continuation of their vileness.)

So, is there a difference between Wings and his commenters and the SNP leadership and their supporters.  Yes, there is.

If you think Wings and anyone who has ever commented on the Wings website are vile, you are at liberty to ignore them.  They are, after all, only expressing personal opinions which can have no lasting impact on the rest of the world.  These people have no power.

However, the same cannot be said of the vileness of the leadership of the SNP.   These people have power.  They cannot be ignored.  Through their control of the SNP and the Scottish Government, their vileness affects everyone in Scotland.  It affects unionists, who are happy with the lack of progress on independence, though they pretend not to be.  It affects independence supporters, who are increasingly distraught as they see opportunity after opportunity slip by.

So, who is the more vile?  Is it those expressing personal opinions on a website that you can chose to ignore, or is it those who have the power to force their vileness down the throats of everyone in Scotland? 

Each of you can decide for yourself.


BEAT THE CENSORS
Many Facebook sites are increasingly censoring bloggers like myself who can be critical of the actions of the SNP and the Scottish Government. They are attempting to prevent bloggers from getting their message out, so we have to depend on readers sharing the blog posts. If you liked this post or others I have written, please share this and take out a free subscription by clicking the follow button on the home page or on the posts. You will then be notified by email of any new posts on the blog. Thank you.


SALVO
The progress of Salvo has been the most encouraging development since 2022. It is doing sterling work educating Scots about the Claim of Right and spelling out what it means that the Scottish people are sovereign, not any Parliament. Salvo has joined with Liberation.scot to develop campaigns the results of which will be available soon.

LIBERATION.SCOT
We are seeking to build up liberation.scot to at least 100,000 signatures as part of our plan to win recognition at the UN as an official liberation movement. We intend to internationalise our battle for independence and through the setting up of the Scottish National Council we will develop our arguments to win progress in the international courts. Please help by signing up at liberation.scot. The membership of liberation.scot is also where the first members of Scottish National Congress will be balloted for selection.